I suppose we have let this happen to ourselves, perhaps democracy requires a constantly vigilant populace, in which case we have only ourselves to blame. But there are those of us who have resisted & attempted to convince the public of the dangers created by large government and who certainly don't deserve the same fate as the muppets who followed the blind over a cliff. So what is the next step in governmental evolution, how do we improve upon the failures of democracy? Personally I would see the whole pointless farce of government demolished but I doubt many others are so willing to give up their hard fought 'right to vote'.
Probably the most popular idea is localisation, make politicians more accountable and implement decisions by & for local people. As good as this sounds it doesn't solve the problem of an overburdening central body and depends on just how far are people willing to take the idea of localisation. Who decides taxation, crime/defence policies or personal liberty laws (drugs, sex, driving requirements, etc)? Surely having local people decide on exactly what goes on in their surrounding area produces the happiest constituents, but then aren't we just talking about splitting the country up into smaller allied countries/states?
But then if we are dividing down into smaller local states how small do we go? County, town or village size? Surely the most satisfactory democracy, from the voters point of view, is one where a single vote has the biggest impact (you can see where I'm going with this), which essential would involve ruling over your own life and making your own decisions. Oh look Anarchy, wonderful we made it, what a success; no government & total control over your own life.
No comments:
Post a Comment